Ex-Lyndoch staff go public on “outrageous” home care fees

Elderly and infirm people on home care packages around Warrnambool are losing up to 44 per cent in management fees, with providers allowed to charge what they like. Image: Shutterstock.

Carol Altmann – The Terrier

Two ex-Lyndoch Living senior staff have gone public on astronomical fees being charged for some home care packages used by elderly and infirm people across Warrnambool and the south-west.

The pair recently set up their own small, home care business in response to what they describe as “outrageous” management charges, saying clients can lose up to 44% of their package in admin costs.

Tricia O’Keefe and Meridith McKinnon don’t name an employer on their website (La Bella Life home care), but they indicate that they resigned from their workplace after becoming “increasingly uncomfortable” with the management fees.

“We were recently employed by a local, South West Victorian Home Care Package Service Provider.

​”We became increasingly uncomfortable with our clients losing up to 44% of their funds in management fees. Quite frankly, we felt this was outrageous,” the website says.

In launching their own business last week, these two women have shone a light on the potential for elderly and infirm people to be ripped off by a system that allows providers to set their own fees.

A bit of background: home care packages are funded by the Federal Govt to help keep elderly and infirm people in their own homes.

If they are lucky, clients are allocated between $9000 a year for a Level One package, through to $52,000 a year for a Level Four.

This money is then available for a range of services, from meals-on-wheels, to shopping, gardening, nursing care and the like, with the Federal Govt paying the provider, such as Moyne Health, Baptcare or Lyndoch Living, directly.

But there’s a nasty catch.

On top of the hourly cost set by the provider for nursing, gardening or shopping etc, there is also a management fee made up of two parts – “package” and “care” – and this combined fee can be as high as a kite.

There is no cap.

The onus, instead, is on the client to “shop around” for the best deal, as you do when you are elderly, isolated, or infirm, or don’t own a computer, or a smartphone.

Yesterday I “shopped around” on the complicated My Aged Care website, trying to work out the average total management fees charged by Lyndoch Living, Moyne Health, Cobden Health and Baptcare Health.

It took two hours, but it was worth it.

This bit of research confirms that Lyndoch Living and Baptcare Health charge like wounded bulls for managing home care packages – Baptcare sits around 35% and Lyndoch between 36% and 42% in fees.

Moyne Health and Cobden Health are much cheaper and charge, on average, between 22% and 27%. (As an aside, La Bella Life will charge a flat 26%).

[I have included more detail of this fee comparison at the end of this piece].

So, for example, a client with a Level 2 package worth $15,750 a year will lose 42% in fees to Lyndoch Living – or around $6669.

Ouch.

And a Level 4 package of $52,000 will see around $19,000 disappear in fees charged by both Baptcare and Lyndoch.

For what, exactly?

Of course individual packages need to be tailored and adjusted (this is the “care” fee), plus there are broader, compulsory admin tasks (this is the “package” fee), but for every ten clients on a Level 4, some providers are raking in around $190,000 a year.

Again, for what, exactly?

As it stands, some local providers charge up to $100 and $150 an hour as the “care” fee.

I doubt very much the staff involved are earning $100 to $150 per hour.

Worse, all this back-office gouging means less money in the kitty for a client to use for help at home.

National reporters like the ABC’s Anne Connolly are on to this rort and the Federal Govt has admitted it needs to change the system, which is now part of the Royal Commission into Aged Care, but proposed new laws remain on hold.

I asked Lyndoch Living on Tuesday for a comment on how it sets its management fees. There was no response.

I also contacted Meridith and Tricia for a comment on what will be different with their business. This was their response:

“From July 2015, all new home care packages were required to be delivered on a ‘consumer directed care’ basis. Unfortunately, not all providers have been successful in moving to a model where their fees, and the value of their services, is communicated to their clients in a format they understand.

It’s difficult for a client to ‘direct their own care,’ if they aren’t fully aware of the services they can fund with their package, or how much they are paying to have their packaged managed.

We intend to change that.

Our website…explains in detail the range of supports and services a client may be able fund from their Home Care Package. We also publish our management fees in a format that is easy to understand…our clients can access their Package Funds Statement online, at any time of the day.

This ensures our clients know exactly how much they have available to spend.  We do this because we firmly believe the funds belong to the client, not us.”

[If you have a home care package story to share, send me a message via FB or the website.]

Average management fees deducted:*

Package Level 1: $9000 

Lyndoch Living 40%; Moyne Health 25%; Cobden Health 22%; Baptcare 35%.

Package Level 2: $15,750

Lyndoch Living 42%; Moyne Health 26%; Cobden Health 27%; Baptcare 35%.

Package Level 3: $34,250

Lyndoch Living 37%; Moyne Health 26%; Cobden Health 27%; Baptcare 35%.

Package Level 4: $52,000

Lyndoch Living 36%; Moyne Health 26%; Cobden Health 27%; Baptcare 35%.

* For general use only. This is a selection of four home care package providers that service Warrnambool and the south-west. There are others. Please refer to the My Aged Care website for full details.

 




No bones about it, WCC pet rego fees are astronomical

Pet registrations in Warrnambool are already the second highest in Australia and continue to climb. Stock image.

Carol Altmann – The Terrier

Well this is enough to make pet owners barking mad.

Tucked within the pages of the Warrnambool City Council draft budget is a little note that pet registration fees are set to rise – AGAIN.

If this rise goes ahead – as I suspect it will – this time next year a single desexed dog or desexed cat will cost $72 to register, up from $70. It was $54 just a couple of years ago.

The CEO said at last Monday night’s meeting that our rego fees are, “not dissimilar to some other municipalities”.

This is untrue.

We now pay the second highest pet regos fees in Australia, behind only Brighton, in Melbourne.

 

In Ballarat, the fee is $40. In Traralgon, it is $43. In Portland, it is $35. Over in Port Fairy, it is $39…you get the drift.

The reason we are being fleeced, it seems, is that in 2017 the council signed on to a three-year deal with the RSPCA that saw an explosion in its fees for running the council pound – the cost tripled overnight.

Not only that, the cost of running the pound has risen astronomically for EACH year of the three-year deal.

The RSPCA charged the council $328,000 in 2018-19.

Next financial year, which is the last year of its contract, it will charge $425,000: almost half a million dollars!

Holy malooza! It’s enough to make you have kittens.

In response to a question from a ratepayer on Monday night, our CEO explained that the RSPCA is all about saving animals, rehousing them, returning them home etc all of which costs money and is supported by any animal lover, including me.

But here is the rub.

The RSPCA also runs the pound in Portland and they ain’t payin’ anywhere near $70 a dog or cat. Why not? Because, to put it simply, Glenelg Shire negotiated a better deal.

The RSPCA runs very few animal shelters in Victoria now and no doubt those they do run are top notch, but charging $425,000 a year for a city the size of Warrnambool?

I would rather see these funds used to subsidise desexing – of cats, in particular, as happens in South Australia.

As it also happens, the WCC has just advertised a tender to run the pound from 2021-22. Will the RSPCA be, again, the only one to apply?

Or maybe the council, post C19 when people need to be redeployed, could think about using that half a million bucks a year to run the pound again itself?

Unless we want to see pet regos go up and up and up, it could be the best option.

[The WCC draft budget is open for public comment and feedback until 3 June.]

 




Ouch! WCC sports ground fees climbing by 100%

A move toward a 100% fee hike to use council sporting grounds is now in its second year and starting to hurt. Image: Sportsflix

Carol Altmann – The Terrier

It’s amazing what falls out of a budget when you give it a good hard shake, like the 100 per cent fee hike over four years for the use of Warrnambool’s public sports grounds.

Ouch! How is that for a whack in the cahoonas?

Just like the big whack to register your dog in 2019, the new fee structure started as part of an earlier Warrnambool City Council budget (2017-18), but the full impact is only starting to bite as sporting clubs receive their second batch of bills.

With my stellar sporting career now well behind me – (err, cough) – I had no idea this fee crunch was happening.

Local clubs certainly do.

Having paid 25% more last financial year, clubs are now paying another 25% on top of that, and will do so again, so that by the end of 2020-21 the user fees will have fully doubled.

You can see the fee increases for yourself in the snapshot below, but, for example, a District League, Category 2 sportsground that was costing a cricket club $2581 per season in 2016-17 was bumped up to $3226 the following year, and by the end of the next financial year will cost $5041 per season.

The change is all part of the council’s move to a stronger “user pays” system to off-set the costs of maintaining and operating its 14 sports grounds, which cost around $635,000 a year.

Before the major fee hike, only about 10% of this cost was covered by the clubs.

The council is now moving their share of the cost to 25%.

This might all make sense financially for the council, but for small, not-for-profit sports clubs, it is proving a big pill to swallow.

 

As one cricketer said to me, we have to remember that the $5000 fee for his club is for only the length of a cricket season, not a full year, and that many clubs already rely heavily on volunteers, sponsors and donations to survive.

Back when the idea of a major fee hike was first raised, at the end of 2014, club representatives piled into the Lighthouse Theatre to listen to council recreation and culture manager Russell Lineham explain the council’s thinking and, at that time, he assured clubs that nobody wanted to see them go out of business.

Now that the 25% a year increases are actually here and starting to hurt, it appears that some clubs are worried about just that. It also appears that some councillors are worried too.

 

In a letter to clubs earlier this year, Mr Lineham said the council had received both written and verbal feedback from clubs and, as a result of their concerns, the fee structure was now under review.

“Council officers will undertake a review…to determine whether any changes can be made to improve the equity of fees levied to the various tenant clubs,” he wrote.

In the meantime, however, the winter season bills are due and must be paid.

So if you see a sporting club out turning sausages at Bunnings, be sure to buy one…or two…or even three.

If you would like to see The Terrier keep digging up, sniffing out and chewing on local issues, please consider throwing something in the tip jar.

Terrier Tip Jar